Record profits

Inflation is a key economic concept that affects the purchasing power of consumers, the decisions of businesses, and the overall health of the U.S. economy. Understanding how it works is crucial for grasping economic policy and navigating financial decisions, as it influences everything from the cost of groceries to the interest rates on loans. Inflation refers to the rate at which the general level of prices for goods and services rises, eroding the purchasing power of money. When inflation occurs, each dollar buys fewer goods and services than it did previously.

The U.S. measures inflation through changes in the cost of a basket of consumer goods and services over time. However, while this is an important measure, it is not the best indicator of the overall economy. A single measure like inflation doesn't account for other key factors such as employment levels, wage growth, or GDP performance, which are also essential.

Several factors contribute to inflation in the U.S. economy. One major factor is increased demand. When consumers or businesses have more money to spend, demand for products and services increases. If supply does not keep pace with demand, prices rise. For example, during times of economic recovery, like after the 2008 financial crisis, consumers regain confidence and spend more, driving demand. Supply chain disruptions also play a role. Shortages of goods or supply chain issues can lead to cost-push inflation, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused disruptions in global supply chains and led to higher prices for goods such as cars and electronics. Government policies can also influence inflation. Large-scale government spending, such as stimulus packages, injects money into the economy, increasing demand and potentially leading to inflation. Additionally, monetary policy—such as actions taken by the Federal Reserve—affects inflation by controlling the money supply and interest rates. Wage increases are another contributing factor. When wages rise, companies may pass the increased labor costs onto consumers in the form of higher prices. A significant rise in the federal minimum wage, for example, could lead to higher prices in industries reliant on low-wage workers.

Inflation is typically measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Producer Price Index (PPI). The CPI measures the average change over time in the prices paid by consumers for a market basket of goods and services, including items like food, housing, and transportation. The PPI tracks the average changes in selling prices received by domestic producers for their output, measuring inflation from the perspective of producers and reflecting the costs of goods at the wholesale level before they reach consumers. The Federal Reserve plays a central role in controlling inflation in the United States. It uses monetary policy tools such as setting interest rates, regulating the money supply, and buying or selling government securities to influence inflation. One common tactic is raising interest rates to combat high inflation. When interest rates are higher, borrowing becomes more expensive, slowing down economic activity, reducing consumer and business spending, and easing inflationary pressures. Conversely, if inflation is too low, which can indicate a weak economy, the Fed may lower interest rates to encourage borrowing and spending, stimulating economic growth. One of the Fed's key mandates is to maintain price stability, usually targeting an inflation rate of around 2% per year. This is considered a healthy level of inflation that encourages economic growth without eroding purchasing power too quickly.

Inflation has several effects on the overall U.S. economy. It decreases purchasing power, meaning that as inflation rises, the value of each dollar falls, and consumers can buy less with the same amount of money. This disproportionately affects people with fixed incomes, such as retirees, who may struggle to keep up with rising costs. Rising inflation can also lead to wage inflation, where workers demand higher wages to keep up with the increasing cost of living. However, this can lead to a wage-price spiral, where rising wages further push up prices. Inflation also impacts savings and investments, as it erodes the real value of money saved over time. For example, if inflation is 3% and your savings earn a 2% interest rate, you are effectively losing purchasing power. Investors may turn to assets that hedge against inflation, such as stocks or real estate, which tend to offer returns that outpace inflation.

The impact of inflation on purchasing power, wages, and investments has long been a critical issue for the U.S. economy, but this challenge is not unique to modern times. In fact, inflation has played a pivotal role in shaping the nation's economic history, dating back to its earliest years. One of the most significant early episodes of inflation occurred during the American Revolutionary War, when the fledgling government faced severe financial constraints. To understand how inflation has evolved and influenced the U.S. economy, it is helpful to look at how inflationary pressures emerged during this foundational period.

During the early years of the United States, particularly during the American Revolutionary War, inflation became a significant problem as the Continental Congress faced enormous financial pressures to fund the war effort. The Congress, lacking the power to levy taxes, relied heavily on printing paper money, known as Continental Currency, to cover the costs of military supplies, pay soldiers, and sustain the revolution. This currency was not backed by gold or silver, and its value was based purely on the public's confidence in the government's ability to win the war and stabilize the economy afterward.

However, several factors contributed to the failure of this system and the onset of hyperinflation. For one, the Continental Congress printed vast amounts of Continental Currency to meet rising expenses. This rapid increase in the money supply, without a corresponding increase in goods and services, devalued the currency. As more currency flooded the economy, each note became worth less, causing prices for goods and services to rise quickly.

Secondly, as the war dragged on and the Continental Army faced setbacks, public confidence in the currency began to falter. People were less willing to accept Continental Currency for transactions, which further weakened its value. Merchants and foreign nations, wary of the declining worth of the currency, either refused to accept it or demanded large quantities in exchange for goods, exacerbating inflation.

The war also caused significant disruptions to trade and production, leading to shortages of essential goods such as food, clothing, and ammunition. These shortages pushed prices higher, and the declining value of the Continental Currency made it even harder for the government to afford supplies. The scarcity of goods, combined with the overabundance of money, created a perfect environment for hyperinflation.

Finally, the British government actively undermined the Continental Currency by producing counterfeit bills and flooding the American economy with fake notes. This tactic eroded trust in the currency even further, accelerating its devaluation and worsening inflation.

By 1781, the value of the Continental Currency had dropped so severely that it was practically worthless. People had to use enormous amounts of the paper money just to purchase basic goods, leading to the famous phrase "not worth a Continental." To address this, Congress eventually abandoned the currency and resorted to borrowing and seeking foreign assistance to finance the remainder of the war. The experience with hyperinflation during the Revolutionary War taught early American leaders the dangers of unchecked currency issuance, influencing future monetary policy decisions in the young nation.

The 19th century saw a series of economic booms and busts, with periods of inflation often linked to wars and economic expansion. The War of 1812, for instance, caused inflation as the government borrowed heavily to finance military expenditures. Similarly, during the Civil War, both the Union and the Confederacy printed large amounts of currency to cover wartime costs. The Union’s issuance of “greenbacks” (paper currency not backed by gold or silver) led to inflation in the North, while hyperinflation ravaged the South as the Confederate dollar lost nearly all its value.

Following the Civil War, the U.S. experienced periods of deflation rather than inflation, particularly during the late 19th century. This deflation was driven by the nation’s adherence to the gold standard, which limited the money supply. Farmers and debtors were especially hurt by falling prices, which increased the real value of their debts. The debate over inflation versus deflation became a central issue in American politics during this time, with populist movements advocating for the free coinage of silver to increase the money supply and spur inflation. The 1896 presidential election, where William Jennings Bryan famously delivered his “Cross of Gold” speech, encapsulated the political struggle over monetary policy and inflation.

The early 20th century brought significant changes to the U.S. monetary system, with the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913. The Federal Reserve was created to provide the country with a more flexible and stable monetary system, giving the government a tool to manage inflation through monetary policy. World War I led to another bout of inflation as the U.S. ramped up production to support the war effort. The post-war period saw prices rise rapidly, peaking in the early 1920s, but this was followed by a severe deflationary period during the Great Depression of the 1930s, when prices fell sharply due to a collapse in demand.

World War II once again brought inflationary pressures as the government borrowed heavily and ramped up production for the war effort. To control inflation, the government imposed wage and price controls, rationing, and issued war bonds to reduce consumer demand. After the war, inflation surged briefly as price controls were lifted and consumer spending increased in the post-war economic boom.

The second half of the 20th century was marked by several significant inflationary periods. The most notable occurred in the 1970s, often referred to as the "Great Inflation." Several factors contributed to this period of high inflation, including the Vietnam War, increased government spending on social programs, and the oil shocks of 1973 and 1979. These oil crises, driven by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) embargo and production cuts, caused energy prices to skyrocket, which in turn drove up the prices of goods and services across the economy. Inflation reached double digits, peaking at over 13% in 1980.

In response, the Federal Reserve, under the leadership of Chairman Paul Volcker, took aggressive action to combat inflation by dramatically raising interest rates. This policy, known as “Volcker shock,” successfully reduced inflation but also triggered a deep recession in the early 1980s. However, by the mid-1980s, inflation had stabilized, and the U.S. entered a period of relative price stability that lasted for several decades.

The late 20th and early 21st centuries saw inflation remain relatively low and stable, with the Federal Reserve continuing to manage inflation through monetary policy, targeting an annual inflation rate of around 2%. However, inflationary pressures reemerged in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, when the Federal Reserve implemented unprecedented monetary policies, such as near-zero interest rates and quantitative easing, to stimulate the economy. While inflation remained low for much of the 2010s, concerns about future inflation persisted as the economy recovered.

More recently, the COVID-19 pandemic had profound effects on inflation in the U.S., driven by disruptions in supply chains, labor market challenges, and shifts in consumer demand. The initial stages of the pandemic led to deflationary pressures as lockdowns reduced consumer spending and economic activity, but inflation surged in the aftermath due to a combination of government policies, supply shortages, and unprecedented stimulus measures. Donald Trump's administration played a critical role during this period, and its response to COVID-19, particularly in terms of economic policy and pandemic management, has faced significant scrutiny for contributing to the inflationary pressures that followed.

One of the main factors behind the inflation spike during the pandemic was the disruption of global supply chains. As countries went into lockdown, the production of goods slowed, and international trade was hampered. The Trump administration, in its handling of the pandemic, failed to anticipate or mitigate these disruptions effectively. Early in the pandemic, there was a lack of coordination between federal agencies, states, and private companies, leading to delays in essential goods and services. The administration’s failure to contain the virus quickly and its inconsistent public health messaging only prolonged the economic shutdowns and exacerbated supply chain problems. This disorganization created an environment where shortages of goods like electronics, automobiles, and household supplies led to price increases as demand outstripped supply, fueling inflation.

Trump’s economic response to the pandemic has been criticized for its short-term focus on stimulating demand rather than addressing long-term structural issues, as well. While stimulus payments and enhanced unemployment benefits under the CARES Act did provide crucial relief to millions of Americans during a time of crisis, the lack of focus on supply-side solutions contributed to inflationary pressures down the line. For instance, while consumers had more disposable income due to stimulus checks, there was little effort to address the simultaneous labor shortages and supply chain bottlenecks that were preventing the economy from meeting rising demand. This mismatch between high consumer demand and constrained supply drove prices higher, particularly in industries like housing, cars, and energy.

Moreover, Trump’s administration’s decision-making regarding the pandemic was often guided by political concerns rather than sound public health or economic policy. The administration's early downplaying of the virus and resistance to stronger measures, such as nationwide mask mandates or coordinated lockdowns, led to a prolonged pandemic. The slow rollout of testing, coupled with mixed messaging on the severity of COVID-19, delayed the ability to reopen the economy safely. This extended the period of economic uncertainty, which destabilized markets and contributed to inflationary pressures as businesses struggled to operate efficiently amidst constantly changing conditions.

Furthermore, Trump’s decision to focus on reopening the economy quickly—despite ongoing public health risks—did little to stabilize inflation. While reopening was necessary for economic recovery, doing so prematurely, without adequate safety measures or a robust national strategy for controlling outbreaks, led to continued disruptions in the labor market. Many workers, particularly in low-wage sectors, were reluctant to return to jobs that exposed them to high health risks, further exacerbating labor shortages. These shortages drove up wages in certain industries, which in turn contributed to higher prices as businesses passed on their increased labor costs to consumers.

Finally, Trump's approach to international trade during his presidency, particularly the imposition of tariffs on goods from China, added to inflationary pressures during the pandemic. The trade war with China disrupted the flow of essential goods, particularly in industries such as electronics and medical supplies. While these tariffs were intended to protect American businesses, they ultimately led to higher costs for imported goods, compounding the supply shortages already caused by the pandemic. As the U.S. struggled to meet consumer demand with domestic production alone, the reliance on expensive imports fueled inflation.

Despite Donald Trump's mishandling of COVID-19, it’s important to acknowledge that any sitting president would have faced immense challenges in managing the pandemic. COVID-19 was an unprecedented global health crisis that disrupted economies and overwhelmed healthcare systems worldwide, regardless of leadership. The complexity of the virus, the need for swift adaptation, and the uncertainty surrounding its spread would have tested even the most capable administrations. However, Trump's response was particularly poor compared to countries that took swift, decisive action. Nations like New Zealand and South Korea, which reacted appropriately by implementing strict lockdowns, extensive testing, and contact tracing, managed to limit both the spread of the virus and its economic impact. Their proactive measures allowed them to avoid prolonged economic downturns and saw quicker recoveries.

By contrast, Trump’s downplaying of the virus, inconsistent messaging, and failure to implement a coordinated national strategy led to higher infection rates and a longer, more damaging economic crisis in the U.S. His reluctance to follow scientific advice and prioritize public health measures, coupled with politically motivated decisions, made an already difficult situation far worse. While any leader would have faced immense challenges, Trump's decisions exacerbated the health and economic fallout, in stark contrast to countries that navigated the crisis more effectively.

In addition to his mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic, Donald Trump’s time in office was marked by policies that further concentrated power in corporate America and among the wealthy class, contributing to an economy that increasingly favored the rich at the expense of the working and middle classes. Trump’s administration pushed a range of initiatives that benefited corporations and the ultra-wealthy, laying the groundwork for the widening inequality and economic instability the country now faces, including inflationary pressures that disproportionately hurt ordinary Americans. His presidency fueled the beginning stages of what some see as a shift toward oligarchy, where a small elite hold disproportionate influence over politics and the economy.

One of the most glaring examples of Trump’s favoritism toward the wealthy was the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which drastically lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and provided substantial tax cuts to the richest Americans. While Trump touted this as a boon for the economy and middle-class families, the reality is that the vast majority of the benefits went to corporations and the wealthiest individuals. Corporations, instead of using the tax cuts to create jobs or raise wages as Trump promised, overwhelmingly used the extra capital to buy back their own stocks, boosting share prices and enriching shareholders and executives. Meanwhile, the tax cuts contributed to a ballooning federal deficit, limiting the government’s ability to respond to future crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. These policies set the stage for a more entrenched divide between the wealthy and everyone else, fostering an economic environment where corporate power grew unchecked.

Another example of Trump’s corporate-friendly policies was his aggressive deregulation agenda. His administration rolled back hundreds of regulations in sectors like environmental protection, labor standards, and consumer rights. These rollbacks were frequently framed as necessary to reduce burdens on businesses, but they often left workers and consumers more vulnerable. By weakening rules on everything from workplace safety to environmental protections, Trump effectively gave corporations more freedom to prioritize profits over public welfare. For example, the dismantling of environmental protections allowed fossil fuel companies to expand operations with fewer safeguards, profiting at the expense of long-term environmental and public health. This deregulation also contributed to a system where a few large corporations could consolidate even more power, reducing competition and creating conditions where inflationary pressures, like those seen post-pandemic, became easier for these firms to impose with little resistance.

Trump’s trade policies, particularly his trade war with China, also contributed to inflationary pressures. While intended to protect American industries, Trump’s tariffs on Chinese goods ultimately backfired. By raising the costs of imports, particularly in manufacturing and agriculture, many U.S. businesses passed these costs onto consumers in the form of higher prices. This policy contributed to price increases even before the pandemic hit, and the resulting trade disruptions exacerbated inflationary trends during and after the COVID crisis. Instead of revitalizing American manufacturing as promised, Trump’s trade war increased production costs and worsened supply chain issues, setting the stage for the inflation crisis that followed.

Trump’s approach to government was characterized by cronyism, where appointments and policy decisions often favored his corporate allies and loyalists over the broader public interest. His administration was filled with former CEOs, industry lobbyists, and political allies who advanced policies designed to benefit corporate interests rather than the American people. For instance, his administration’s handling of the pharmaceutical industry, particularly during the early stages of the pandemic, emphasized profit margins over public health, leaving the country ill-prepared for the crisis. His close relationships with corporate executives also underscored a pattern of prioritizing the wealthy elite over the needs of average Americans.

This corporate favoritism and obsession with capitalism, at the expense of the public good, contributed to the inflationary crisis that emerged after the pandemic. By empowering corporations to focus on profit maximization and stock buybacks while gutting regulations and protecting wealth accumulation, Trump’s policies entrenched economic inequality. As the post-pandemic economy struggled to regain its footing, large corporations—having been emboldened by years of Trump-era deregulation and tax cuts—exploited inflationary conditions to increase prices and profits. This led to a scenario where, despite widespread economic hardship, corporate profits soared while the lower and middle classes faced rising costs and stagnant wages.

Trump’s policies contributed not only to the immediate economic imbalances that followed the pandemic but also to a long-term shift toward an economy dominated by a small group of corporate and wealthy elites. His presidency accelerated the consolidation of corporate power and wealth, creating a system where fewer people hold outsized influence over the country’s economic direction. This concentration of power, combined with unchecked corporate profiteering during the inflation crisis, has pushed the U.S. further down the path toward oligarchy, where the interests of the wealthy dictate policy, leaving the majority of Americans behind. The inflation crisis is not just a result of pandemic recovery—it’s also a reflection of the unequal, corporate-dominated system that Trump helped build.

The Biden administration inherited an economy crippled by a poorly managed COVID-19 response, the global economic crisis that ensued, rising inflation across the globe, and the long-term effects of Trump’s policies that disproportionately benefited corporations and the wealthy. Despite these obstacles, President Biden’s administration has made significant strides in stabilizing the economy, fostering job growth, and promoting an inclusive recovery, demonstrating that it is, in fact, a great economic administration.

One of the clearest indicators of the Biden administration’s economic success is its ability to mitigate the damage caused by Trump’s mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic. When Biden took office in early 2021, the U.S. was still grappling with a pandemic that had devastated public health and the economy. Trump’s inconsistent messaging, lack of a national strategy, and failure to effectively manage the crisis led to prolonged lockdowns, higher death tolls, and deep economic scarring. In response, the Biden administration quickly enacted a coherent and science-based approach, which included ramping up vaccine distribution, implementing national safety guidelines, and passing the American Rescue Plan—a $1.9 trillion relief package that provided direct financial aid to families, expanded unemployment benefits, and supported small businesses. These actions not only helped control the pandemic but also fueled a swift economic rebound, bringing the unemployment rate down and spurring rapid job creation. The Biden administration’s focus on public health and economic recovery allowed the U.S. economy to bounce back far more quickly than many other nations.

Beyond managing the pandemic, the Biden administration has successfully navigated a global economic crisis marked by rising inflation—a challenge faced by nearly every major economy around the world. Inflationary pressures, driven by supply chain disruptions, labor shortages, and rising energy prices, were exacerbated by the fallout from the pandemic. In response, Biden took proactive steps to address these inflationary challenges, from negotiating to alleviate bottlenecks in the global supply chain to releasing oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to help lower gas prices. In addition, his administration worked to pass legislation like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which invests in long-term economic growth by modernizing the nation’s transportation, energy, and communications infrastructure. This forward-thinking investment in infrastructure aims to create jobs and improve economic productivity, addressing both short-term inflationary concerns and laying the groundwork for a more resilient economy in the future.

Moreover, the Biden administration has made strides in reversing many of the policies from the Trump era that disproportionately empowered corporations and the wealthy. Under Trump, corporate tax cuts and deregulation fueled growing inequality, but Biden has worked to shift the focus toward a more equitable economy. His efforts to increase taxes on the wealthiest Americans and corporations, alongside proposals to close tax loopholes that primarily benefit the rich, demonstrate a commitment to reducing inequality. The Inflation Reduction Act is another key legislative achievement under Biden that targets corporate tax avoidance, combats climate change, and invests in green energy, all while promoting economic fairness. This landmark legislation raises taxes on large corporations and uses the revenue to reduce the federal deficit, which helps combat inflation in the long run.

Despite the global inflation crisis, the Biden administration’s policies have also succeeded in fostering record-breaking job growth and wage increases. By the summer of 2022, the U.S. had recovered all the jobs lost during the pandemic and then some, reaching historically low unemployment rates. Wages have also risen, particularly for lower-income workers, as the administration has supported policies that empower labor, such as the promotion of unionization efforts and increasing federal contracts that prioritize fair wages. These gains have directly benefited the working class and helped counter the concentration of wealth and power that had accelerated under Trump’s corporate-friendly policies.

In contrast to Trump’s emphasis on benefiting the wealthy and corporations, Biden’s administration has placed a clear focus on building back an economy that works for everyone. His agenda includes expanding the social safety net, supporting child care and education, and promoting labor rights—all of which aim to uplift middle- and working-class Americans. Programs like the expanded Child Tax Credit have provided direct financial relief to millions of families, reducing child poverty and boosting consumer spending. This broad-based approach to economic recovery, centered on improving the well-being of ordinary Americans, reflects the Biden administration’s commitment to ensuring that economic growth benefits all citizens, not just the wealthiest.

The Biden administration’s economic policies have been both responsive and forward-looking, balancing immediate recovery efforts with long-term investments in a more equitable and sustainable future. By addressing the economic fallout from Trump’s mismanagement, navigating a global inflation crisis, and reversing policies that favored corporations and the wealthy, President Biden has set the U.S. on a path toward a more resilient and inclusive economy. Despite inheriting significant challenges, the administration’s achievements in job creation, wage growth, infrastructure investment, and inflation management demonstrate that it has been a strong and capable economic steward during a particularly tumultuous period in U.S. history.

The Trump-Biden transition offers a clear example of a broader historical pattern where Republican administrations implement policies that harm the economy and contribute to rising inflation, only to leave office before the full effects of their actions materialize. The next Democratic administration is often tasked with cleaning up the economic fallout, stabilizing the economy, and fostering job growth, only to be blamed for the economic challenges that were set in motion by their predecessors. This pattern is not new; it has played out repeatedly in modern American political history, where Democrats have consistently had to repair the damage done by previous Republican administrations, yet often do not receive credit for their economic stewardship. Instead, by the time the economy has fully recovered, the Republicans have positioned themselves to take advantage of the improvements, claiming credit for a strong economy built on Democratic efforts.

Historically, Republican policies, particularly those focused on deregulation, tax cuts for the wealthy, and corporate-friendly measures, have had long-term negative effects on the economy. One prime example is the Reagan administration in the 1980s. While Ronald Reagan's tax cuts and deregulation efforts were initially praised for boosting economic activity, they also contributed to soaring deficits and widened income inequality. By the end of his term, inflationary pressures had increased, and the middle and working classes faced stagnant wages. When George H.W. Bush took office, these economic challenges persisted, leading to a recession in the early 1990s. However, it was Bill Clinton, a Democrat, who inherited a struggling economy and turned it around by focusing on fiscal responsibility, reducing deficits, and promoting job creation. Under Clinton, the U.S. experienced one of its longest periods of sustained economic growth and job creation, but his efforts were later overshadowed by the Republican victory in 2000, when George W. Bush took office during a time of economic strength.

Similarly, George W. Bush’s administration followed a similar pattern. Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthy, combined with the costly wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, led to ballooning deficits and weakened the economy over time. His administration also presided over significant deregulation in the financial sector, setting the stage for the 2008 financial crisis. By the time Barack Obama, a Democrat, took office in 2009, the U.S. was in the midst of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. Obama’s administration implemented the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and other policies that helped stabilize the financial system, saved the auto industry, and brought the economy back from the brink. Under Obama, the economy steadily recovered, with millions of jobs added and unemployment falling significantly by the end of his second term. Yet, by 2016, when the economy had finally rebounded, Republicans used economic discontent, fueled by lingering frustrations from the 2008 crash, to win the White House with Donald Trump.

Ultimately, inflation alone does not provide a comprehensive picture of the U.S. economy, nor does it definitively prove the success or failure of economic policies. While inflation is often highlighted as a key indicator of economic health, it is only one piece of a much larger puzzle that includes job growth, wage levels, productivity, corporate profits, consumer demand, and overall economic stability. Viewing inflation in isolation can be misleading, as it fluctuates due to a wide range of factors, many of which are beyond the control of any single administration or policy.

Inflation is a normal part of a growing economy and can be driven by a variety of causes, including shifts in consumer demand, supply chain disruptions, energy price fluctuations, and global economic conditions. For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic caused unprecedented disruptions in global supply chains, leading to shortages and higher prices worldwide. The surge in demand as economies reopened after lockdowns, combined with these supply constraints, contributed to inflation, but these factors do not necessarily indicate long-term economic problems. In fact, some inflation is expected as economies rebound from recessions, and it can be a sign of recovering consumer confidence and demand.

Additionally, inflation can be influenced by external events far outside domestic economic policies, such as oil price shocks, geopolitical instability, or global financial crises. For example, inflation in the 1970s was largely driven by oil price spikes following the OPEC oil embargo, which affected economies around the world. More recently, inflation in the post-pandemic era has been driven by global supply chain issues and the energy crisis exacerbated by the war in Ukraine. These international factors highlight that inflation does not necessarily reflect the effectiveness of U.S. economic policies.

Moreover, focusing too heavily on inflation ignores other important indicators of economic well-being. For example, job creation, wage growth, and reductions in unemployment are crucial measures of economic progress, particularly for working and middle-class Americans. During periods of inflation, it is possible to see rising wages and job growth, which can offset the impact of higher prices. The Biden administration, for instance, has overseen record job creation and a significant drop in unemployment, which are positive signs of economic recovery, even as inflation remains a concern.

In many cases, inflation is a temporary phenomenon, especially during periods of transition or recovery. As supply chains recover, labor markets stabilize, and demand normalizes, inflation can subside without causing lasting harm to the economy. In fact, a modest level of inflation is considered healthy by economists, as it indicates ongoing demand and helps prevent deflation, which can be far more damaging by leading to a vicious cycle of falling prices and wages.

It’s also important to consider the role of corporate behavior in inflation, particularly during times of economic disruption, as was seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. In some instances, corporations took advantage of inflationary periods not simply to cover rising costs, but to opportunistically increase prices well beyond what was necessary, thereby boosting their profits. This practice, known as “corporate profiteering,” became especially evident during the pandemic when supply chain disruptions and labor shortages were widespread, giving companies a convenient justification for hiking prices.

For example, in sectors such as food, consumer goods, and energy, corporations cited increased costs and logistical challenges as the reason for rising prices. While there were legitimate cost pressures due to supply chain issues and higher demand for certain goods, many companies raised prices far beyond the necessary level to maintain profit margins. These actions were driven by a desire to maximize profits during a time of uncertainty, rather than purely in response to higher costs. In fact, corporate profit margins soared during this period, despite the broader economic hardships faced by most consumers. Major companies reported record profits while passing disproportionate price increases onto consumers. For instance, food processing giants and oil companies saw significant spikes in profits while continuing to raise prices on basic goods like groceries and fuel, disproportionately impacting lower- and middle-income households.

This kind of price gouging in the guise of responding to inflation has a compounding effect. As corporations artificially inflate prices, it drives up the cost of living for consumers, exacerbating inflationary pressures across the economy. This can lead to a vicious cycle where companies continue to raise prices under the pretext of rising costs, even when their input costs stabilize or fall. The result is that consumers are paying more for goods and services, but those higher prices do not reflect a fundamental weakness in the overall economy. Instead, they reflect corporate power and market dominance, where large firms can raise prices with little fear of losing customers due to their market control or lack of competition.

This practice of corporate profiteering during inflationary periods highlights the need for stronger regulatory oversight to prevent companies from exploiting economic disruptions for excessive profit. The pandemic revealed the imbalance of power between large corporations and consumers, as these companies were able to significantly boost their earnings while most Americans struggled with stagnant wages and rising costs. Without proper regulation, corporations can continue to monopolize markets, reduce competition, and manipulate prices, further widening the wealth gap.

Policies that ensure a more equitable distribution of wealth are essential to curbing this kind of behavior. This could include more robust antitrust laws to prevent monopolies and promote competition, as well as stronger regulations on price-setting in key industries. Additionally, tax policies that target excessive corporate profits could be used to redistribute wealth and invest in public goods and services, alleviating the burden on working and middle-class families. Ultimately, corporate profiteering during periods of inflation underscores the need for a system that holds corporations accountable and protects consumers from unfair price hikes, ensuring that the benefits of economic recovery are shared more broadly.

The political polarization between Democrats and Republicans on the issue of inflation often distracts from a much deeper and more pressing reality: the widening wealth gap and the increasing concentration of power and wealth in the hands of corporations and the upper class. While both parties argue over the causes and solutions to inflation, they often fail to address the root issue—that economic inequality has grown to unprecedented levels. This disparity is not merely a byproduct of inflation but a consequence of decades of policies that have allowed corporate profits to soar while wages for the working and middle classes have stagnated. Historically, this growing wealth divide, if left unchecked, can push societies toward oligarchy, where a small elite holds disproportionate control over economic and political power, undermining democracy.

In the current economic landscape, the wealth gap between the richest Americans and the rest of the population has become more pronounced. Corporations, especially in sectors like technology, energy, and finance, have seen record-breaking profits, even as inflation squeezes everyday consumers. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many large companies capitalized on market disruptions to increase their prices and profits, while millions of lower- and middle-class Americans faced job insecurity, rising living costs, and stagnant wages. These trends have accelerated the concentration of wealth in the hands of a small group of individuals and corporations, further widening the economic divide.

While inflation is often presented as the primary issue affecting the economy, it is more accurately a symptom of deeper structural problems. Wealthy individuals and corporations are generally able to shield themselves from inflation’s worst effects, as they have access to assets and financial instruments that appreciate in value, even during periods of economic instability. Meanwhile, the lower and middle classes bear the brunt of rising prices for essential goods like housing, food, and fuel. This economic inequality is compounded by the fact that wages have not kept pace with inflation, leaving many Americans with less purchasing power. The polarization around inflation allows both parties to avoid tackling the fundamental issue: the growing concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few.

Historically, societies where wealth and power become increasingly concentrated in the hands of a small elite have seen the rise of oligarchic structures. In such systems, economic and political power become intertwined, allowing the wealthy to exert undue influence over policy decisions, often at the expense of the broader population. In the U.S., corporate lobbying and political donations have grown enormously, allowing wealthy individuals and companies to shape legislation and regulations in their favor. This has resulted in tax policies, deregulation, and economic strategies that disproportionately benefit the rich while leaving the lower and middle classes behind.

The polarization between Democrats and Republicans over inflation often ignores this creeping oligarchy, focusing instead on short-term political point-scoring. Republicans frequently point to government spending and labor costs as the primary drivers of inflation, while Democrats highlight supply chain issues and corporate greed. Both parties, however, have largely failed to address the systemic issues of economic inequality and the increasing concentration of wealth. The debate over inflation distracts from the fact that corporations and the upper class are steadily gaining more influence, while the lower and middle classes lose both economic power and political representation.

Without addressing this growing disparity, the U.S. risks sliding further into oligarchy, where the wealthiest individuals and corporations wield disproportionate control over the economy and politics. This threatens the very foundations of democracy, as economic inequality translates into political inequality. As corporations gain more influence over the political system through lobbying and campaign contributions, policies that benefit the majority are often overlooked in favor of those that protect the interests of the wealthy.

Politicians often use inflation as a convenient tool to finger-point and assign blame for economic woes, focusing on specific price increases like gas and housing to make their case. However, the true drivers behind these price hikes often have more to do with corporate monopolization and lack of regulation than traditional inflationary pressures. Gas prices and housing costs are frequently highlighted as key indicators of inflation, but the rising costs in these sectors can often be traced back to corporate practices, consolidation, and insufficient regulation that allow companies to exploit their market power.

For instance, gas prices are often a political flashpoint. During times of rising fuel costs, politicians frequently blame the sitting administration for poor economic management or policies that allegedly hurt the energy industry. However, the real story often lies in the growing monopolization of the oil industry. A handful of large oil companies control much of the market, which gives them the ability to manipulate supply and demand to their advantage. When gas prices rise, it is often due to oil companies deliberately restricting production or taking advantage of geopolitical events to justify price hikes. This manipulation isn't about inflation in the traditional sense but rather about these companies maximizing profits with little regulatory oversight to keep them in check. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, oil prices briefly crashed, but as demand returned, oil companies were slow to ramp up production, allowing them to inflate prices and reap enormous profits.

Another example is the housing market, where rising home prices are frequently attributed to inflation, but the reality is more tied to corporate consolidation and financialization of the real estate sector. Large investment firms and banks, such as BlackRock, have increasingly bought up large swaths of homes and rental properties, driving up prices. These corporations, with deep pockets, can outbid regular homebuyers and then raise rents or resell at much higher prices, which limits supply for individual buyers. This artificial inflation in the housing market isn't a result of organic supply and demand but rather the consequence of a financial system that allows large institutions to dominate the market. The lack of regulation around these practices has allowed these corporations to inflate housing costs, pushing homeownership further out of reach for many Americans and driving rents sky-high.

In both examples—gas prices and housing costs—what is often labeled as "inflation" is actually the result of corporate monopolization and a failure to regulate industries that have outsized control over essential goods and services. By focusing on inflation as a scapegoat, politicians often ignore or divert attention from the real culprits: corporations leveraging their power to maximize profits at the expense of consumers. This creates a distorted economic narrative where politicians blame inflation, but the underlying issue is unchecked corporate power that drives up costs for working and middle-class Americans.

Inflation has a long and complex history within the U.S. economy, shaped by various factors like wars, policy decisions, and global disruptions. However, it does not define the overall health of the economy. While inflation is often used as a focal point in economic discussions, it is frequently politicized, with Republicans and Democrats using it as a tool to blame one another rather than addressing the deeper issues of economic inequality. This polarized finger-pointing between parties overlooks the true divide—between the rich and the poor—as rising prices often highlight the growing concentration of wealth and power among corporations and the wealthy, while the middle and lower classes face the brunt of economic hardships. While inflation is not necessarily an important indicator of the health of the U.S. economy, it may be the most important indicator of a slide toward oligarchy, a system in which a small, elite group holds disproportionate power and influence over politics, economics, and society.