Okay, Boomer

Born in an era of post-war economic growth, Baby Boomers enjoyed the advantages of affordable housing, accessible higher education, and steadily increasing wages, all against a backdrop of political stability. In stark contrast, Millennials have come of age in a time marked by economic uncertainty, overwhelming student debt, stagnating wages, and pressing environmental challenges, alongside deep political divisions. It's essential for Baby Boomers to recognize the profound differences between the opportunities their generation enjoyed and the harsh realities Millennials now face. By understanding how their generation benefited from economic and social systems that have largely eroded, Baby Boomers can contribute meaningfully to ensuring a better future for the generations to come.

The Baby Boomers inherited a remarkably strong and booming economy from the Greatest and Silent Generations, shaped by the economic and social policies that followed World War II. The period between the late 1940s and the 1970s, often referred to as the post-war economic boom, provided Baby Boomers with unprecedented economic advantages, laying the foundation for the prosperity many of them experienced in their early years.

The Silent Generation, which came of age during the Great Depression and World War II, experienced severe economic hardship in their youth but saw a sharp turn toward prosperity as the war ended. The U.S. emerged from World War II as the world’s dominant economic power, with its infrastructure intact while much of Europe and Asia was in ruins. This created a unique set of circumstances where the U.S. led in global production and trade.

During the late 1940s and 1950s, U.S. manufacturing thrived as the country ramped up production to meet domestic and international demands. Industries like automobile manufacturing, construction, and consumer goods flourished. The federal government supported economic growth through policies like the G.I. Bill, which provided education and home loan benefits to returning veterans, and investments in infrastructure like the interstate highway system under the Eisenhower administration.

The Silent Generation handed over a strong labor market to the Baby Boomers, marked by high employment and rising wages. In the 1950s and 1960s, the U.S. experienced full employment in many sectors, especially in manufacturing and construction. Unions were strong during this period, and collective bargaining helped secure higher wages and benefits for workers. Union membership reached its peak during this time, with roughly 30-35% of the workforce unionized in the 1950s, ensuring that workers had a voice in negotiations for better working conditions and pay.

The minimum wage, adjusted for inflation, was much closer to a living wage during this period, allowing Baby Boomers who entered the workforce in the 1960s and 1970s to enjoy greater purchasing power than subsequent generations. The standard of living improved for many middle-class families, enabling them to buy homes, cars, and other consumer goods that were previously unattainable for many.

Baby Boomers, particularly those who entered the workforce between the 1950s and 1970s, enjoyed the benefits of a flourishing economy that provided an abundance of well-paying, stable jobs. During this era, the American economy was booming, driven by a thriving manufacturing sector and strong labor unions that ensured favorable working conditions and job security. This economic landscape laid the foundation for financial stability, upward mobility, and long-term career growth.

At the heart of this prosperity was the manufacturing industry, which dominated the economy and provided stable employment for millions of Baby Boomers. Industries such as automotive, steel, and textiles were key players, offering jobs that often required only a high school diploma. These positions paid well enough for a single income to support an entire family, and many workers spent their entire careers at the same company. The security of these jobs, paired with consistent wage increases, pensions, and retirement benefits, fostered a sense of stability and allowed Baby Boomers to build financially secure lives.

Major employers like General Motors, Ford, and U.S. Steel became economic pillars, offering generous wages and comprehensive benefits. For Baby Boomers, securing a job in one of these industries often meant lifelong employment, where they could count on regular promotions and incremental pay raises. The manufacturing sector was a cornerstone of the American middle class, allowing workers to enjoy a level of financial security that enabled home ownership, family support, and retirement planning.

Job security during this period was not only a result of a strong economy but was also reinforced by the power of labor unions. In the mid-20th century, union membership in the U.S. workforce hovered around 30-35%, and unions played a pivotal role in protecting workers’ rights. They secured higher wages, better working conditions, and valuable benefits like healthcare and pensions. For Baby Boomers, unions ensured they had a voice in negotiations with employers, which often led to collective bargaining agreements that guaranteed regular wage increases, job protection, and retirement security.

Union strength allowed Baby Boomers to confidently build long-term careers, often with the same employer, knowing their jobs were protected. This era’s labor market rewarded loyalty, with companies valuing and investing in long-term employees. Baby Boomers could rely on steady employment, annual raises, and a defined pension, making it easier to plan for major life milestones like buying a home or saving for their children's education.

Another significant advantage for Baby Boomers was the purchasing power of the minimum wage during their early careers. For much of this generation, the federal minimum wage was more closely aligned with the cost of living, providing a livable income even for entry-level or lower-skilled workers. In 1968, for example, the federal minimum wage was $1.60 per hour, equivalent to roughly $12.00 per hour today when adjusted for inflation. This higher purchasing power allowed young Baby Boomers to support themselves with fewer financial constraints, even on part-time jobs, while attending college or vocational school.

The combination of a robust job market, strong labor unions, and a livable minimum wage created an environment where Baby Boomers had access to financial independence early in life. Many employers also provided healthcare and pension benefits, even for lower-wage workers, adding to the economic security that defined this generation's workforce experience.

Pensions played a pivotal role in securing the financial future of Baby Boomers, offering them a level of retirement security that is largely unmatched by later generations. For many Baby Boomers, especially those employed in stable, long-term jobs in industries like manufacturing, pensions were a cornerstone of their economic success and peace of mind.

Defined benefit pensions, which were common at the time, guaranteed a specific monthly income after retirement based on years of service and salary history. This meant that Baby Boomers who spent their careers at a single company could count on a reliable and steady income in retirement, without having to worry about the fluctuations of investment markets or the need for aggressive personal savings. Pensions not only provided financial security but also allowed workers to plan for retirement with confidence, knowing that their years of service would translate into a dependable income stream.

For Baby Boomers, pensions were a key component of the social contract between employers and employees. Companies like General Motors, Ford, and other industrial giants offered pensions as part of their comprehensive benefits packages, which also included healthcare and other perks. These pensions encouraged long-term employment, as the benefits grew more substantial the longer an employee stayed with the company. This created a system where Baby Boomers were incentivized to remain loyal to their employers, knowing they would be rewarded with a comfortable retirement.

The presence of pensions also contributed to the stability and predictability of retirement planning. Baby Boomers could rely on their pension income to cover basic living expenses, allowing them to retire with confidence. In addition to Social Security benefits, many retirees could live comfortably without needing to dip heavily into personal savings or investments. This security enabled many Baby Boomers to retire earlier than later generations and enjoy a more leisurely, less financially stressful retirement.

For Baby Boomers who didn’t work in industrial jobs, an affordable college education opened the doors to lucrative careers in emerging fields such as finance, technology, and professional services. During the mid-20th century, college tuition costs were significantly lower than they are today, making higher education accessible to a broader segment of the population. This affordability allowed many Baby Boomers to pursue college degrees without accumulating massive amounts of debt, enabling them to enter fast-growing, high-paying sectors that were critical to the booming post-war economy.

In the 1960s and 1970s, the cost of attending college was much more closely aligned with the average income. Public universities and community colleges, in particular, offered low-cost education options, and government programs like the GI Bill further expanded access to higher education for Baby Boomers. Many Boomers were able to pay for their tuition through part-time jobs or with minimal financial assistance from their families, allowing them to graduate with little to no debt.

With a college degree in hand, Baby Boomers were well-positioned to capitalize on the rapid expansion of industries like finance, technology, and professional services. The financial sector, for example, was undergoing significant growth, with Wall Street and banking firms offering high-paying jobs to those with the necessary skills. Similarly, the technology sector was beginning to take off, laying the groundwork for future innovations in computing and electronics. Baby Boomers who pursued degrees in business, engineering, or the sciences were able to enter these fields with relative ease, securing well-paying jobs and advancing their careers quickly.

The affordable college education available to Baby Boomers not only provided access to these booming sectors but also set the stage for long-term career growth. With less student debt weighing them down, they were able to invest in homes, save for retirement, and contribute to the growing middle class. Higher education allowed them to gain the skills needed to thrive in an increasingly specialized and competitive job market, positioning them to benefit from the economic prosperity of the time.

In essence, for Baby Boomers who sought careers outside of manufacturing, the low cost of higher education was a critical factor in their economic success. It gave them the skills and credentials to enter rapidly expanding fields, providing upward mobility and financial stability without the financial burdens that later generations would face.

For both blue-collar and white-collar Baby Boomers, one of the greatest advantages they enjoyed was access to extremely affordable housing. Throughout the mid-20th century, housing was far more accessible than it is today, with home prices being much lower relative to income. This allowed Baby Boomers to purchase homes on modest wages, often on a single income, providing them with financial stability and the opportunity to build wealth through home ownership.

In the 1950s through the 1970s, the post-war economic boom and the expansion of suburban areas fueled a housing market that catered to the growing demand for affordable homes. Government programs, such as the GI Bill, made it easier for veterans to buy homes with low-interest loans, and federally backed mortgages allowed millions of Baby Boomers to purchase homes with small down payments and manageable monthly costs. In addition, mortgage interest rates were generally favorable, enabling home buyers to finance their homes without the financial strain that would be seen in later decades.

For Baby Boomers in blue-collar jobs, affordable housing in suburban and rural areas was particularly accessible. Workers employed in manufacturing or construction could purchase homes close to their places of employment, often with room to raise a family on a single income. Housing developments were being rapidly constructed to accommodate this demand, and the availability of reasonably priced homes gave working-class Baby Boomers the ability to achieve the American Dream of home ownership. This sense of stability was further reinforced by the strong job market and the ability to live comfortably without taking on significant debt.

White-collar Baby Boomers, benefiting from the affordability of higher education and access to growing sectors like finance and technology, were also able to take advantage of affordable housing. With steady incomes and good benefits, they could afford homes in desirable suburban areas or even in growing urban centers. The cost of housing remained within reach for most families, even those just starting their careers. For many Baby Boomers, this was a time when owning a home was not seen as an unattainable goal, but rather a natural part of building a life and securing financial independence.

Across the board, housing costs were low compared to household incomes. In the 1970s, the median home price was around two to three times the median household income, whereas today, that ratio has significantly increased. This affordability allowed Baby Boomers to buy homes without taking on enormous mortgages or needing dual incomes to make ends meet. As a result, many were able to purchase homes early in life, pay them off relatively quickly, and build equity, providing a foundation for long-term financial security.

As Baby Boomers grew older, they also inherited the substantial benefits of government investments in social programs and infrastructure, many of which were initiated by the Greatest and Silent Generations before them. Statistically, Baby Boomers have benefited from more social support than any other generation in U.S. history. These programs played a crucial role in providing financial security and stability, particularly in retirement. Among the most significant were Social Security and Medicare, both of which became pillars of economic stability for older Americans, ensuring that Baby Boomers could look forward to a more secure future.

Social Security, established in the 1930s as part of the New Deal, was originally designed to provide a safety net for the elderly and disabled. By the time Baby Boomers began to retire, Social Security had become an essential source of income for millions of Americans. The program ensured that workers who had paid into the system throughout their careers could rely on a steady monthly payment in retirement, helping to protect them from poverty in their later years. For many Baby Boomers, Social Security became a cornerstone of their retirement planning, supplementing pensions and personal savings, and allowing them to maintain their standard of living after leaving the workforce.

In addition to Social Security, Medicare, introduced in 1965, further solidified the economic security of Baby Boomers as they aged. Medicare provided affordable healthcare coverage for Americans over 65, ensuring that retirees would not face crippling medical costs. For Baby Boomers, the availability of Medicare meant that they could access necessary medical care without depleting their retirement savings. It was especially critical as healthcare costs rose over the decades, giving older adults a reliable way to cover doctor visits, hospital stays, and prescription drugs.

These government programs, along with broader investments in infrastructure and public services, created a foundation of stability for the Baby Boomer generation. Public investment in highways, schools, and community services improved the quality of life for many, while social safety nets like Social Security and Medicare provided long-term security. These programs, built and sustained by previous generations, ensured that Baby Boomers could benefit from an era of relative prosperity and financial peace of mind as they entered retirement.

As Baby Boomers aged and solidified their economic position, many began to vote in ways that protected their own wealth and lifestyle, often at the expense of future generations. This shift in voting patterns played a significant role in shaping U.S. political and economic policies over the past several decades. As the largest and most influential demographic for much of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, Baby Boomers wielded substantial power at the ballot box, and they helped elect leaders who enacted policies that safeguarded their own financial security while undermining the economic prospects of younger generations.

One of the clearest examples of this trend was the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980, with Baby Boomers making up a significant portion of his voter base. Reagan's administration implemented policies that drastically shifted the economic landscape, reducing the power of labor unions, cutting taxes for the wealthy, and deregulating industries. Reagan's policies were designed to stimulate economic growth, but they also favored corporations and the wealthy while limiting wage growth for average workers. Many Baby Boomers, by this point well-established in their careers and enjoying the benefits of earlier economic policies, supported these measures as a way to preserve their wealth and ensure a low-tax environment for their retirement.

The decline of labor unions during and after the Reagan years is one of the key legacies of this period. Labor unions had once been a powerful force advocating for workers’ rights, wage increases, and job security—benefits that Baby Boomers had enjoyed during their early working years. However, under Reagan, union-busting became more common, and policies were introduced that weakened their influence. This shift disproportionately hurt younger generations, who entered the workforce at a time when collective bargaining power was diminished, leading to stagnating wages and reduced benefits. Meanwhile, Baby Boomers, many of whom were already benefiting from union-secured pensions and protections, were less directly affected by these changes and often supported the dismantling of union power.

As Baby Boomers continued to grow older and wealthier, their voting patterns often aligned with policies that favored corporate interests over workers' rights. This trend became even more pronounced with the election of Donald Trump in 2016. Like Reagan, Trump enjoyed strong support from older voters, particularly Baby Boomers, who were attracted to his promises of deregulation, tax cuts, and economic nationalism. However, Trump's policies—such as his 2017 tax reform—disproportionately benefited corporations and the wealthy while doing little to address wage stagnation or income inequality for younger workers.

In addition to supporting policies that curtailed labor rights and wage growth, Baby Boomers were also instrumental in backing measures that made education less affordable for younger generations. During the mid-20th century, Baby Boomers had benefited from low tuition costs and generous government support for higher education. However, in the decades that followed, state and federal funding for public colleges and universities was cut, leading to a sharp rise in tuition costs. Baby Boomers, many of whom were already well into their careers and no longer reliant on educational assistance, often supported politicians who prioritized tax cuts over public investment in education. As a result, younger generations have been saddled with massive student debt, making it much harder for them to achieve the same level of financial security that Baby Boomers once enjoyed.

Housing policy has also been shaped by the voting patterns of Baby Boomers, who overwhelmingly benefited from affordable housing during their younger years. Throughout the mid-20th century, Baby Boomers were able to purchase homes at prices that were low relative to their incomes. However, as home ownership became a key source of wealth for Baby Boomers, many began to support policies that restricted housing development, driving up property values. Zoning laws, limits on new construction, and resistance to affordable housing initiatives have made it increasingly difficult for younger generations to enter the housing market. Baby Boomers, having already secured their homes and benefiting from the rising value of their properties, have often resisted efforts to make housing more accessible, contributing to the housing affordability crisis.

Moreover, Baby Boomers have also supported the reduction of social welfare programs, even though many of them benefit from programs like Social Security and Medicare. As they reached retirement age, Baby Boomers became increasingly focused on protecting these programs for themselves, often voting for candidates who promised to safeguard their benefits while cutting welfare programs that primarily serve younger and lower-income individuals. Baby Boomer voters consistently vote to scale back food stamps, welfare, healthcare, and housing assistance. This has led to a political environment in which social safety nets have been eroded for those most in need, while programs that disproportionately benefit older, wealthier individuals remain largely untouched.

The combination of these policies—cutting labor rights, limiting wage growth, increasing education costs, restricting housing access, and cutting social welfare programs—has had a profound impact on the economic prospects of younger generations. While Baby Boomers were able to enjoy the benefits of a strong economy, affordable education, and accessible housing during their prime working years, they have largely voted for policies that have made it more difficult for subsequent generations to achieve the same level of financial security.

Aside from the profound economic impacts of Baby Boomer policies, the environmental consequences of their post-war consumerism and the deregulation of industries have also significantly contributed to the acceleration of climate change. The Baby Boomer generation, coming of age in the post-World War II era, was at the forefront of an unprecedented period of industrial and consumer growth that laid the foundation for many of today’s environmental challenges. Their lifestyle, fueled by mass production, suburban expansion, and reliance on fossil fuels, left a lasting ecological footprint that has compounded over the decades.

The economic boom that Baby Boomers enjoyed was driven by industrial expansion, which in turn led to increased resource extraction, manufacturing, and energy consumption. With this economic growth came a surge in consumerism, as Baby Boomers embraced the conveniences of mass-produced goods, automobiles, and suburban living. The rapid expansion of suburban areas led to the development of highways, reliance on cars, and urban sprawl, all of which were highly dependent on fossil fuels. This era also saw a sharp rise in the consumption of single-use plastics, processed goods, and energy-intensive appliances, creating a throwaway culture that prioritized convenience over sustainability.

The environmental cost of this lifestyle was significant. The increased demand for energy, driven by industrial production and consumer habits, meant that fossil fuel consumption skyrocketed. This reliance on oil, coal, and natural gas contributed to the dramatic increase in carbon emissions throughout the second half of the 20th century, setting the stage for the global climate crisis we face today. Industrial pollution, deforestation, and the overuse of natural resources all surged during this time, leading to the degradation of ecosystems and the depletion of vital resources such as clean water and arable land.

As Baby Boomers entered positions of political and economic power, many supported policies that deregulated industries in the name of economic growth, further exacerbating environmental damage. Ronald Reagan’s administration, which had strong backing from Baby Boomers, is a prime example of this trend. During Reagan's presidency, environmental regulations were rolled back to favor corporate interests, and funding for environmental protection agencies was slashed. This period saw a marked shift away from the environmental activism that had gained traction in the 1970s, as concerns about economic growth and corporate profitability took precedence over ecological sustainability.

Deregulation of industries, particularly in sectors like energy, manufacturing, and transportation, meant that corporations were able to operate with fewer restrictions on their environmental impact. This led to increased pollution, unchecked resource extraction, and a lack of accountability for corporate contributions to climate change. Deregulation also delayed the adoption of cleaner technologies and practices, as industries were not incentivized or required to reduce their carbon footprint. While these policies contributed to short-term economic gains, they also intensified the long-term environmental crisis by allowing industries to operate without sufficient oversight.

The effects of these policies have been felt globally, as the climate crisis has intensified in recent decades. The unchecked emissions from fossil fuel consumption during the late 20th century have led to rising global temperatures, more frequent and severe natural disasters, and the degradation of ecosystems that are vital to maintaining the planet’s ecological balance. Baby Boomers, by supporting policies that prioritized economic growth over environmental sustainability, played a significant role in accelerating these changes.

In addition to direct pollution, the post-war boom in car ownership and suburban development also contributed to significant environmental harm. Suburbs, designed to accommodate the Baby Boomer population explosion, were built around car-dependent infrastructure, which not only required large amounts of land but also fueled the transportation sector’s growth as a leading contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. As Baby Boomers moved into suburban homes, the need for highways and increased energy use for larger homes also expanded, further locking the generation into an environmentally damaging cycle of high resource consumption.

Moreover, Baby Boomers have largely been resistant to the environmental reforms that later generations have advocated for in response to the climate crisis. Many older voters, who have enjoyed decades of economic growth built on fossil fuel consumption and deregulated industries, have been less supportive of policies like carbon taxes, renewable energy subsidies, and stricter environmental regulations. This has created political challenges for younger generations trying to address climate change, as the urgency for environmental action often conflicts with the interests of older voters who are more concerned with maintaining their financial stability and the industries they relied on for decades.

Socially, while Baby Boomers were present during pivotal moments of progress, such as the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, which was largely initiated by the Silent Generation, they have not consistently carried forward the torch of social advancement. Many of the most significant movements for racial, gender, and LGBTQ+ equality that have emerged in recent decades have been driven primarily by younger generations, often in the face of resistance from Baby Boomers.

For instance, the fight for gay marriage, which culminated in the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to legalize it in 2015, was largely spearheaded by younger generations. Millennials and Gen Xers were the driving force behind the movement for LGBTQ+ rights, while many Baby Boomers, particularly conservative voters, pushed back against these changes. Even after the landmark decision, a significant portion of Baby Boomers continued to express opposition, with older voters generally being less supportive of same-sex marriage compared to younger voters. This generational divide illustrates how, despite witnessing the struggles for equality in earlier decades, many Baby Boomers have not been enthusiastic participants in the further expansion of social justice.

Similarly, Baby Boomers have often been resistant to progress on race relations. While they were witnesses to the transformative power of the Civil Rights Movement, their voting patterns and political support in the decades that followed have frequently favored policies that maintain the status quo or roll back progress. Issues like police reform, systemic racism, and affirmative action continue to face opposition from a significant number of Baby Boomers, who tend to view these initiatives with skepticism or outright hostility. Meanwhile, younger voters have largely led the charge in advocating for more comprehensive approaches to racial justice, such as the Black Lives Matter movement, which has encountered considerable pushback from older generations.

Immigration has also been a flashpoint of generational tension, with many Baby Boomers supporting more restrictive immigration policies. Throughout the Trump administration, Baby Boomers were a key demographic in backing policies that curtailed immigration, including the construction of a border wall and the institution of travel bans. These policies stood in stark contrast to the views of younger generations, who tend to favor more inclusive immigration policies that prioritize human rights and humanitarian assistance. The generational divide is evident in polling data, with younger voters consistently showing more empathy and support for immigrants and refugees than their Baby Boomer counterparts.

In these and other areas, the reluctance of many Baby Boomers to embrace progressive social change has often stalled or slowed the momentum for equality and inclusion. Despite having benefited from the civil rights advancements of earlier generations, many Baby Boomers have resisted similar progress for marginalized groups today, often voting in ways that preserve traditional structures rather than advocating for expanded rights and representation.

While it’s important to recognize that not all Baby Boomers oppose social progress—many individuals within this generation have been strong allies for civil rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and immigration reform—the general trend has been one of resistance to the kinds of rapid social change that younger generations are calling for. As a result, the burden of advancing social justice has often fallen to younger voters, who continue to push forward efforts to protect marginalized communities and promote equality in the face of persistent opposition from older generations.

The result of this generational dynamic has created a striking contrast between what Baby Boomers inherited from the Silent Generation and what they have left for Millennials.

By the time Millennials entered the workforce, they encountered an economic landscape starkly different from that of the Baby Boomers. Union membership, which had once been a powerful force in securing fair wages and job security, had plummeted to less than 10% in many industries, particularly in the private sector. This decline, driven by political and economic shifts beginning in the 1980s and accelerating through the 2000s, severely eroded the bargaining power of workers. For Millennials, this meant a labor market characterized by more precarious employment, fewer benefits, and less job security. While Baby Boomers had the protection of unions that guaranteed pensions, stable incomes, and career longevity, Millennials have been left to navigate a gig economy where short-term contracts and freelance work are increasingly the norm.

Starting in the 1990s and accelerating through the 2000s, globalization, outsourcing, and automation led to the loss of millions of manufacturing jobs that had once provided a stable middle-class income for Baby Boomers. Factories, particularly in regions like the Rust Belt, shut down as companies moved production overseas to take advantage of cheaper labor markets. These stable, well-paying jobs, which often did not require a college degree, provided Baby Boomers with economic security. In contrast, Millennials faced a vastly different reality, entering a workforce where long-term, middle-class employment was scarce, forcing them onto a different path that often required a college degree just to access entry-level positions.

With manufacturing jobs dwindling, the prevailing narrative shifted: higher education became seen as the only viable route to success. For Millennials, attending college was increasingly viewed as a prerequisite for economic stability, but this came at a heavy price. Unlike Baby Boomers, who could attend college with minimal financial burden, Millennials were confronted with skyrocketing tuition costs. From 1980 to 2020, the cost of attending a four-year public university increased by over 200%, according to the College Board. By 2020, the average student loan debt for a Millennial graduate was around $33,000—more than three times what Baby Boomers faced when adjusted for inflation. Instead of starting their adult lives with the potential to build wealth through savings, Millennials often began their careers in debt, struggling to keep up with loan repayments and delaying key milestones like buying a home or saving for retirement.

In contrast to the financial head start that Baby Boomers had, Millennials have been trapped in a cycle of financial hardship. The federal minimum wage, which Baby Boomers could often rely on as a livable wage, has remained stagnant at $7.25 per hour since 2009. Adjusted for inflation, this minimum wage is far below what it was in the Baby Boomer era, when the minimum wage in the 1960s and 1970s could support a household in a way that is impossible today. Millennials now find that even full-time jobs at or near the minimum wage are insufficient to cover basic living expenses like rent, utilities, and healthcare. This wage stagnation, coupled with the rising cost of living, has forced many Millennials to work multiple jobs or rely on gig work, which typically offers no benefits or job security, exacerbating their financial precarity.

In addition to facing stagnant wages, job security has also become a luxury for Millennials in ways that Baby Boomers could not have anticipated. For Baby Boomers, it was common to build a career at a single company, moving up the ranks over time with the expectation of steady promotions, wage increases, and ultimately, a stable retirement. Union contracts and corporate loyalty reinforced this sense of long-term employment. Millennials, on the other hand, face a job market characterized by short-term contracts, freelance work, and the gig economy. "Job hopping" has become a necessity for many Millennials as they chase better opportunities, higher wages, or even basic job security in a labor market that offers few guarantees.

Adding to the challenges faced by Millennials is the widening gap between productivity and wages. Since the 1970s, worker productivity has increased by over 60%, but wages have barely kept pace. Millennials are expected to work harder and produce more than previous generations, but they are not seeing the same wage growth that Baby Boomers enjoyed. This disconnect has contributed to the financial insecurity of Millennials, who often find themselves overworked and underpaid. According to the Economic Policy Institute, the average hourly wage for a young worker (adjusted for inflation) in 2020 was actually lower than it was for a similar worker in 1979, a stark contrast to the upward mobility that Baby Boomers experienced.

Millennials have been left without the financial safety net of defined-benefit pensions that many Baby Boomers relied on. In the mid-20th century, it was common for Baby Boomers to work for companies that offered pensions, which provided a stable source of income in retirement. These pensions were funded by employers and ensured financial security without the need for extensive personal savings. However, pensions have largely been replaced by 401(k) plans, which shift the responsibility of saving and investing onto the individual. For Millennials, this means navigating a volatile stock market and, often, struggling to contribute to their retirement accounts due to high levels of student debt and stagnant wages. In addition to the disappearance of defined-benefit pensions, Millennials also face the possibility that Social Security may not exist in its current form by the time they retire. With the Social Security Trust Fund projected to be depleted by the 2030s, Millennials may see reduced benefits or even face a system that is no longer sustainable. As a result, Millennials face a much more uncertain retirement future than Baby Boomers did.

In addition to individual economic struggles, Millennials have faced collective challenges that significantly shaped their generation’s outlook. They experienced the worst economic recession since the Great Depression during the 2008 financial crisis, which left lasting impacts on their careers, financial stability, and ability to accumulate wealth. The Great Recession delayed home ownership, increased debt, and lowered earnings potential for many Millennials.

This generation also lived through the longest war in U.S. history—the war in Afghanistan—lasting nearly 20 years and draining national resources, with many Millennials serving or knowing peers who were directly affected by it. On top of these challenges, they endured the COVID-19 pandemic, which further disrupted the global economy, exacerbated unemployment, and widened wealth inequality, just as many Millennials were approaching their prime working years.

Perhaps most uniquely, Millennials are the first generation to go to schools where they face a growing threat of gun violence. In the United States, mass shootings and school shootings have become more frequent, and the risk of violence in classrooms has deeply affected their sense of safety and well-being. Some Millennials even grew up in an era where children are statistically more likely to encounter a school shooter than graduate high school, a reality that has driven their generation’s strong advocacy for gun control and policy reform.

These cumulative crises have profoundly shaped how Millennials engage with politics, social justice, and economic policies, making them a generation that is more vocal in pushing for systemic change.

In pushing for system change, Millennials are also advocating social movements that confront deeply entrenched issues in race relations, LGBTQ+ rights, and inequality. Unlike Baby Boomers, who came of age during a period of relative social stability following the civil rights victories of the 1960s, Millennials are tackling persistent systemic problems that remain unresolved, often without the same level of widespread support from older generations.

Millennials are driving conversations about racial justice through movements like Black Lives Matter, which highlights ongoing racial disparities in policing, incarceration, and economic opportunities. These efforts focus on dismantling structural racism, something Millennials see as a continuation of the unfinished work from the civil rights era. While Baby Boomers participated in some early activism, many of them now view the civil rights movement as a historical milestone, whereas Millennials see it as a struggle that is still very much alive and urgent.

In the realm of LGBTQ+ rights, Millennials have been at the forefront of pushing for full legal equality and social acceptance. They have expanded the fight for rights beyond same-sex marriage, advocating for transgender rights, gender nonconformity, and inclusive policies in schools and workplaces. Baby Boomers, in contrast, are less likely to embrace these progressive changes, with some holding more traditional views on gender and sexuality. This generational divide often places Millennials in direct conflict with older societal norms that were shaped by Baby Boomers' experiences.

Furthermore, Millennials are challenging what they perceive as an oligarchic system of wealth and power that has been entrenched over the decades, often shaped by Baby Boomer policies and political influence. With rising inequality and the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few, Millennials view the current system as benefiting those at the top while leaving the majority struggling. This sentiment fuels their activism for reforms such as campaign finance reform, wealth taxes, and corporate accountability, areas where they feel previous generations have fallen short in addressing. Millennials, therefore, view themselves as advocates for a more equitable society, attempting to dismantle systems of power that they believe were solidified during the Baby Boomer era.

In contrast to Baby Boomers' more traditional views on government and corporate influence, Millennials see many of the social, political, and economic structures as needing radical overhaul. They are more likely to view the concentration of wealth and influence as the result of policies favoring corporations and the wealthy, leading to a generational divide in how each group approaches solutions to these problems. Millennials' push for social justice, equity, and fairness goes hand-in-hand with their broader goal of reshaping a system they feel does not work for the majority.

But the divide between Baby Boomers and Millennials extends beyond social and economic issues. Millennials are also on the front lines of climate activism, grappling with the environmental destruction wrought by decades of unchecked industrial growth and deregulation policies that Boomers largely supported. From the post-war consumer boom to the rise of deregulation in the 1980s, Baby Boomers lived through a period of unprecedented industrial expansion and consumerism, both of which have contributed to the accelerating climate crisis. This "growth-at-all-costs" mentality, which often prioritized corporate profits over environmental responsibility, left Millennials facing a planet in peril.

The fossil fuel industry, in particular, has benefited from decades of political protection and deregulation—policies that Baby Boomers often supported or passively accepted. Millennials, on the other hand, are far more likely to view climate change as an existential threat. According to a 2019 Pew Research poll, 69% of Millennials believe that climate change should be a top priority for government action, compared to just 48% of Baby Boomers. Millennials have taken the lead in movements like Fridays for Future, spearheaded by younger climate activists like Greta Thunberg, and have pressured governments and corporations to take meaningful action to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy. They see the environmental policies of the past as having led to ecological destruction, loss of biodiversity, and a global climate crisis that threatens their future.

Moreover, Millennials are keenly aware that they will bear the brunt of the consequences of climate change, despite having contributed less to the problem than previous generations. Rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and widespread environmental degradation are expected to worsen over the coming decades, making it clear that Millennials will inherit a planet that is fundamentally altered by the actions and policies of the Baby Boomer generation. This has fueled a sense of urgency and frustration among Millennials, who are increasingly critical of what they see as an environmental and economic oligarchy that prioritizes short-term gains over the long-term health of the planet and its inhabitants.

Millennials' push for social progress, economic reform, and environmental justice is not only about advancing their own interests but also about addressing the structural inequalities and climate crisis they feel have been perpetuated by the Baby Boomer generation. Younger generations are demanding a fairer society, one that values inclusivity, equity, and environmental sustainability, not just for themselves but for marginalized communities and future generations.

Many Baby Boomers view Millennials as lazy, overly emotional, and entitled, often attributing these traits to what they perceive as a lack of work ethic or resilience. This generational perception stems, in part, from the differences in the economic and social landscapes each group has navigated. Baby Boomers, who came of age during a time of economic growth and stability, ironically tend to emphasize traditional values like hard work, self-reliance, and upward mobility. When Millennials advocate for work-life balance, mental health awareness, or push back against traditional job structures that have taken advantage of them, some Boomers interpret these actions as signs of laziness or an unwillingness to "tough it out" in the way their generation did. The irony is that Baby Boomers, who benefited from a period of economic prosperity and job security, often fail to recognize that Millennials face a vastly different and more challenging environment. Despite the Boomers’ emphasis on traditional values like hard work and self-reliance, many of the systems that enabled their success—such as affordable housing, stable pensions, and rising wages—have eroded. When Millennials advocate for work-life balance, mental health support, or challenge rigid job structures, they do so in response to an economy that doesn’t offer the same opportunities. Yet, Boomers often misinterpret these calls for change as a lack of resilience, not recognizing that Millennials are adapting to a reality Boomers themselves did not have to endure.

Moreover, Millennials' vocal support for social justice movements, open discussions of mental health, and desire for emotional well-being are sometimes seen by Boomers as being overly sensitive or driven by emotions rather than practical concerns. The Millennial generation’s focus on addressing systemic issues like inequality, mental health, and climate change is often framed by some Baby Boomers as idealistic or unrealistic, contributing to the stereotype that Millennials are emotional and entitled for expecting significant social change. In reality, Millennials’ advocacy for social justice, mental health, and environmental sustainability stems from their lived experiences and the urgent need to address systemic issues that impact their future. Far from being overly sensitive, Millennials are responding to real-world crises: social justice movements that seek to end systemic racism, including the disproportionate killing of Black men by police; a mental health crisis exacerbated by the opioid epidemic, which has devastated communities across the country; and the fight for environmental sustainability, which is literally about securing the future of the planet. Their push for significant change is not rooted in entitlement, but in a pragmatic understanding that the status quo is unsustainable. Millennials recognize that without reform, these problems will only worsen, affecting not just their generation but those to come. Their activism reflects a desire for a more equitable, compassionate, and sustainable world, challenging the outdated assumptions that often frame their efforts as unrealistic.

Maybe it’s not that Millennials are overly sensitive or entitled, but rather that they are highly educated and more aware of the complexities of today’s world. With greater access to information and higher levels of education than previous generations, Millennials are more likely to question systems of inequality, demand mental health support, and advocate for environmental sustainability. Their education has made them critically aware of the challenges facing society, from systemic racism and police brutality to the opioid epidemic and the looming threat of climate change. This heightened awareness might be perceived by some Baby Boomers as idealistic or impractical, but in reality, Millennials are leveraging their education to address the deep-rooted issues that can no longer be ignored.

This generational divide reflects more than just different life experiences—it speaks to fundamental differences in values, expectations, and approaches to solving societal problems, often leading to misunderstandings and misjudgments between the two groups. Interestingly, this tension is not much different from how the Silent Generation viewed Baby Boomers in their youth. The Silent Generation often saw Baby Boomers as lazy, rebellious, and ungrateful, particularly during the counter-cultural movements of the 1960s and 1970s. Baby Boomers were criticized for rejecting traditional norms and pushing for radical social changes, just as Millennials today are scrutinized for challenging established systems. These generational clashes seem to be a recurring cycle, where each new generation is perceived as idealistic or entitled by the one before it.

Despite their differences, for much of U.S. history, each generation has worked to leave the country better off for the next. This long-standing pattern of progress is evident in a variety of political, social, and economic advancements that have improved the quality of life for successive generations.

The Greatest Generation, for instance, came of age during the Great Depression and World War II. They faced immense challenges but ultimately rebuilt the country and the world economy after the war, leading to a period of unprecedented prosperity. They expanded social safety nets, like Social Security, and invested in infrastructure and education, creating opportunities for the Baby Boomer generation to thrive. The Silent Generation, while smaller and less politically dominant, laid the groundwork for major social change during the 1960s, including the Civil Rights Movement, which expanded rights and opportunities for future generations of Americans.

The Baby Boomers themselves inherited a booming economy, stable middle-class jobs, affordable housing, and a thriving manufacturing sector. Previous generations built up social programs, affordable higher education, and a robust labor movement, which allowed Boomers to flourish. However, for the first time in modern U.S. history, the trend of each generation leaving the country better than they found it appears to have reversed, leaving Millennials and Generation Z in a more precarious situation.

Economically, Millennials are entering adulthood in far worse shape than Baby Boomers did. Rising costs of housing, healthcare, and education have outpaced wage growth. For example, in the 1960s and 1970s, it was possible for Baby Boomers to buy a home for the equivalent of around three times the median annual household income. Today, the average home costs over eight times the median income, making home ownership far more difficult for younger generations. Meanwhile, the deregulation of industries and the decline of unions—driven by political shifts during the Baby Boomer era—have left Millennials facing a job market with fewer protections, lower wages, and a gig economy that lacks the stability Baby Boomers enjoyed.

Socially, while previous generations advanced civil rights and equality, progress in areas like race relations, LGBTQ+ rights, and immigration has faced considerable pushback in recent decades. Millennials have had to fight for protections that older generations didn’t secure, such as marriage equality and criminal justice reform. In fact, many Baby Boomers have opposed these movements, contributing to a more polarized political landscape.

Perhaps most pressing is the environmental legacy. Previous generations, while not always aware of the full extent of their actions, benefited from a natural environment that had not yet reached a critical tipping point. The industrial expansion and consumerism of the mid-20th century, combined with the political choices to deregulate and allow fossil fuel companies to thrive, have contributed to the climate crisis that Millennials and Generation Z now inherit. These younger generations are facing the consequences of unchecked environmental degradation—rising sea levels, more frequent and severe natural disasters, and ecological destruction—threatening their futures in ways that prior generations never had to consider.

For most of U.S. history, each generation has taken significant steps to leave the country in a better position for their children and grandchildren. But for the first time, this trajectory has reversed. Millennials and Generation Z are facing a country with higher economic inequality, greater social strife, and an environmental crisis that threatens global stability. The failure to maintain this generational progress is a stark departure from the legacy of past generations and has left younger Americans in a far more precarious position than their predecessors.

What this means is that Millennials, already burdened by unprecedented economic and social challenges, must now work even harder to secure a better future for themselves and for generations to come. Unlike the Baby Boomers who benefited from a thriving economy, affordable housing, and accessible education, Millennials are navigating a landscape defined by low wages, student loan debt, expensive healthcare, and a rapidly diminishing path to home ownership. Despite these setbacks, Millennials are being asked to do more—to shoulder heavier work demands in an economy where financial success remains elusive for many. The harsh reality is that Millennials must work harder than previous generations, despite having fewer opportunities and greater financial burdens. Their fight is not just for their own survival but for future generations, to ensure that the economic, social, and environmental crises they inherited do not worsen for those who follow. Millennials are uniquely positioned between the legacy of the Baby Boomers and the future of Generation Z, and their struggle is driven by the hope that their efforts will create a better, more sustainable world for the generations to come.

What Baby Boomers can do is acknowledge the unique and significant challenges Millennials have faced, setting aside debates over who worked harder or had it worse. Rather than focusing on comparisons, Baby Boomers have an opportunity to foster understanding and cooperation. By recognizing that Millennials have endured unprecedented economic, social, and environmental crises—from the Great Recession and skyrocketing student debt to climate change and mass shootings—Boomers can play a vital role in supporting solutions that benefit not only Millennials but also future generations.

Instead of perpetuating generational tensions, Baby Boomers can engage in collaborative efforts with Millennials to address pressing issues like economic inequality, climate action, and social justice. Working together will help ensure a better world for their grandchildren and great-grandchildren. This collaboration requires humility and a willingness to listen, but it is the key to creating long-term change. Rather than holding onto pride or defensiveness, Baby Boomers can help shape a future that allows everyone to thrive.

Previous
Previous

No escape

Next
Next

Freeness of speech